<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real quick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-ds.com/kc/2008/03/18/real-quick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-ds.com/kc/2008/03/18/real-quick/</link>
	<description>Just another The D&#039;s weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:22:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://the-ds.com/kc/2008/03/18/real-quick/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-ds.com/kc/2008/03/18/real-quick/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>I totally agree.  I heard a similar idea about 4 play in games.  I&#039;d be ok with just eliminating one of the at large teams and keeping it at 64 teams too.  No team above a 6 seed has ever one the tournament right?  And only one team above a 10 seed has ever made the final four I think.  So it&#039;s not like it matters if Villanova, Arizona State, or Syracuse gets in over South Alabama.  The NCAA remains the coolest thing in sports though
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree.  I heard a similar idea about 4 play in games.  I'd be ok with just eliminating one of the at large teams and keeping it at 64 teams too.  No team above a 6 seed has ever one the tournament right?  And only one team above a 10 seed has ever made the final four I think.  So it's not like it matters if Villanova, Arizona State, or Syracuse gets in over South Alabama.  The NCAA remains the coolest thing in sports though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D</title>
		<link>http://the-ds.com/kc/2008/03/18/real-quick/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-ds.com/kc/2008/03/18/real-quick/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Pitt played good as well, this one should be a great game.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pitt played good as well, this one should be a great game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dad</title>
		<link>http://the-ds.com/kc/2008/03/18/real-quick/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-ds.com/kc/2008/03/18/real-quick/#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Good first round for MSU.  Didn&#039;t see the Pitt game but should be a good one in the next round.  If MSU plays D like today, they should win easily.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good first round for MSU.  Didn't see the Pitt game but should be a good one in the next round.  If MSU plays D like today, they should win easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

